Interesting Facts About Singapore

Interesting Facts About Singapore

In 1963, when it became independent from the British Empire and after its economy was devastated by the Japanese occupation during the Second World War, Singapore was nothing more than an agglomeration of shanties. A place where every bathroom and kitchen was shared by several families . Things at the economic and social level were hard, and they weren’t very different at the political level either. The truth is that Singapore’s beginnings weren't at all promising: See, at first, Singapore united with Malaysia,but the romance didn’t last long.

sorce pixels /credit to Adhitya Andanu

Just two years later, in 1965, and after several political and ethnic clashes with the aristocratic and extractive Malaysian government, Singapore was expelled from the Malay Federation and was de facto forced to declare itself independent. Folks, the challenge that this small territory faced was huge: Singapore was poor, it had less than two million inhabitants, and it lacked any natural resources. It wasn’t even self-sufficient in terms of food and water! But just a second, because the story we all know is a bit different, don’t you think? Today, just five decades later Singapore is-an independent country, and this city-state is one of the capitals of the world and one of the richest territories on the planet.


since 1960, Singapore's economy has grown by more than 7.5 percent per year. We’re talking about a huge growth rate that has allowed Singapore to experience the fastest development process in the history of mankind. Today this city’s per capita income is much higher than that of the United States, it is more than twice that of middle-income countries like Spain, and almost four times that of Chile, which is considered the most prosperous Latin American country. Don’t tell me that isn’t amazing. Now, the question we can all ask ourselves is, how did this tiny city-state achieve such a huge amount of economic growth.


This entire story has one clear protagonist: Lee Kuan Yew the autocratic Prime Minister who governed Singapore between 1959 and 1990. Now, few people would’ve bet that this country would end up having a bright future. And, folks, Lee Kuan Yew’s first years leading Singapore didn’t bode well. As Secretary-General of the Popular Action Party, a party that belonged to the socialist international party, this Prime Minister initially flirted with so-called import substitution industrialization policies.


A political approach that blindly commits to protectionism as a way to achieve development. Something that was particularly popular throughout the 20th century in Latin America. Well, actually, in a way, it still is. Really, in his first years of government, Lee Kuan Yew was closer to Argentine politicians than to anyone who supported the free market and globalization. However, unlike what happened in Latin America, in Singapore, they soon realized that this type of policy was by no means the best way to escape poverty. That's why, starting in 1965, a very different approach was launched-- a political and economic commitment that transformed Singapore completely: Opening up to the global market.


“When most Third World countries denounced the exploitation of Western multinationals, in Singapore we invited them. That’s how we achieved growth, technologies and the know-how that boosted our productivity more than any other economic policy could've done.” Lee Kuan Yew) Now, Singapore hasn’t been anything close to a prototype of an orthodox libertarian state, where the government doesn’t interfere in any economic activity. On the contrary, the Singaporean government has played, and still plays a very important role. But before you attack me, let's say they did it in a very different way than we’re used to, for example, in old Europe. “Things are changing quickly and we're having to adjust and keep up; due to technology, globalization, we’ve had to anticipate what's happening, we have to help companies and workers to adapt.” Lee Hsien Loong)


In Singapore, the government didn’t try to take over the larger sections of the economy; nor did they attempt to regulate everything down to the smallest detail; nor, of course, did they try to expand public spending and taxes. Quite the opposite. In Singapore’s case, we can basically think of it as a state-company or, better yet, a city-company. That is, Lee Kuan Yew understood that Singapore needed to attract capital and professionals so that the country could grow and develop;


And within an imperfect competitive environment between economies, and the heavy intervention that exists in the countries we live in, the state can play a key role. And it can do so with policies that always favour competitiveness, investment, and the attraction of companies, instead of bureaucracy or welfare. That’s why the Singaporean authorities developed institutions to guarantee legal security and efficient management of the city;they promoted economic sectors through public-private collaboration, drew up an ambitious productive infrastructure program and, most importantly, promoted savings.


And that’s not all, all policies were designed within a strict budget stability framework and always, always with the mindset of integrating them with private agents, something that rarely happens in countries like Spain, Italy or,of course, Argentina. All right, allow me to explain. It isn’t as much about expanding a port or a road but being able to integrate an attractive institutional framework with services that cause companies to settle in a country, and to invest in order to increase their productivity. Let’s put it another way:


How do companies compete in the market? By offering better conditions than the competition,right? Well Lee Kuan Yew understood that in our world competition between countries isn’t very different. Therefore, perhaps the best way to see and understand the keys to Singapore's success is to view this city-state not as a country to be used, but as a service provider in a competitive industry. In Singapore, the government understood that the community itself, the city itself, was an asset and that, well managed, it could become a competitive advantage. But to understand this better, let’s take a look at some concrete examples of the policies that Lee Kuan Yew set on the table:


First objective: despite having a city with a very high population density, turn it into a non-chaotic, un noisy, and unpolluted place. To do this, the government imposed traffic taxes in 1975, so today traffic in the city is subject to tolls that are charged electronically to all users on the road-- that is, to all vehicles. That way, they managed to impute the streets’ maintenance costs to the real road users, managed to avoid traffic jams, and avoided a big cause of pollution.


The result of this approach has been that today Singapore, despite having a very high population density and being one of the economic engines of the world, has very fluid traffic and, in addition, imposes maintenance costs based on each driver’s use of the road. That is, if the benefit you gain isn’t greater than your toll, which is the maintenance cost of the road itself, then you leave the carat home. And if your benefit is greater, then you have roads through which you can move quickly.


Singapore developed a fantastic, very efficient and affordable public transportation system. Another much more controversial measure due to its paternalism, is forcing all workers to invest a quarter of their salary into a rigid national savings plan that’s also managed by a state organization. With this program, the island’s government gets workers to accumulate savings with which they can pay for health services, educational services and their own retirement. And while that happens, the state gets the capital it needs to invest in projects, in and out of the country, that are understood as essential for the city’s competitiveness. In a certain way, workers don’t only become users but also investors in this city-company. .Of course these types of “interventions” where the state maintains clear leadership, are complemented by a policy that favors free enterprise and one of the freest regulationsin the world in terms of capital, goods, and worker circulation.


in Singapore, taxes are low – for example, someone with a 60 thousand dollar income pays 5 percent income tax -;tariffs are practically non-existent, there’s no minimum wage;public expenditure accounts for approximately 18% of the GDP, and if all that weren't enough, Singapore’s economy is considered to be the second freest in the world! “See, in the world we live in today, being peripheral or being central doesn’t depend on your country’s physical location, it depends on whether or not you have a room and an economy of knowledge. It depends on technology, it’s the only thing that can explain why countries like Singapore have a much better education than us.” Albert Rivera, MP of Spain) The result of all this is that a country that,until a few decades ago, was very poor, is now one of the richest countries in the world. And don’t think that it’s just a matterof economic numbers. Singapore also has some of the best universities,with students at the forefront of subjects like science and mathematics, their healthcare system is considered excellent, there’s no unemployment, there’s no crime, and their expectations for the future are extraordinary.


For example, in the Human Development Index produced by the United Nations, Singapore occupies the tenth place, above countries like Sweden, Iceland, France, and Finland. The negative side--and there is one--is concentrated in its political system, which, although it’s evolving, is still very restrictive of civil liberties. In Singapore, prison sentences are very high,censorship is a normal part of life, and different behaviours aren’t usually well-seen.

Icici bank recruitment for PO Program

how to become IPS OFFICER

Lots of Jobs at HDB Financial services

Apply WNS jobs for freshers

Axis Bank Young Bankers Program 

HDFC Bank Future Bankers Program 

Post a Comment

0 Comments